The same story, without animation or sound. An equal version, not a substitute.
From Idvor to America.
Chapters
The autobiography · 1923
He did not arrive in America alone.
Mihajlo Pupin was a physicist, inventor and professor in New York. His coils made it possible to carry the human voice over long distances through telephone cables.
In 1923 he published his autobiography. It won the Pulitzer Prize in 1924. In the book he looked back on his journey from his native Idvor to America, where he had arrived as a poor young man.
He called the first chapter “What I brought to America”. He mentioned five cents, but also something more precious than money. We begin this story with his memories of childhood. The stars in the sky will represent the people who helped him.
“There are, however, certain things which a young immigrant may bring to this country that are far more precious than any of the things which the present immigration laws prescribe.”
Why do we say this?
The autobiography was published in 1923 and won the 1924 Pulitzer Prize for Biography.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Pupin's coils, placed at regular intervals in telephone cables, keep the signal strong over long distances; in practice they made long-distance calls possible.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
He goes on to say that a young immigrant may bring things more precious than anything the immigration laws prescribe, and asks whether he brought them.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“There are, however, certain things which a young immigrant may bring to this country that are far more precious than any of the things which the present immigration laws prescribe.”
Pupin grew up in Idvor, a village on the Banat plain. In his autobiography he wrote that it could not be found on any map. He remembered nights in the pasture when he and the other herd boys lay with an ear pressed to the ground.
One of them would strike the handle of a knife stuck in the soil, while the others tried to judge where the sound came from and how far away it was. They could hear it better through the ground than through the air.
Much later, when explaining one of his discoveries in his autobiography, Pupin returned to that game.
“Practice made us quite expert in this form of signalling.”
Why do we say this?
At night on the pasture the boys pressed their ears to the ground and judged the direction and distance of a signal by its sound.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“Practice made us quite expert in this form of signalling.”
Pupin himself claims that this pasture experience was the basis of a discovery he made some twenty-five years later. That is his interpretation, not independently established causation.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“It is the basis of a discovery which I made about twenty-five years after my novel experiences in that herdsmen’s summer school in Idvor.”
Mihajlo continued his schooling in Pančevo. His physics teacher was Kos, a Slovene from Carniola, a region now part of Slovenia. In the book Pupin calls him only Kos; the first name Šimon comes from Dragoljub Cucić, in a paper on Pupin and Father Vasa.
Kos soon convinced him that sound was a vibration of bodies. But what the boys knew from the pasture, that sound travels better through hard ground than through the air or through ploughed soil, Kos could not explain; Pupin writes that it is the basis of a discovery he made some twenty-five years later. Kos also first told him about Benjamin Franklin and his kite.
Kos did not answer his questions about light, but encouraged him to keep asking.
“He soon convinced me that sound was a vibration of bodies.”
Why do we say this?
Kos, a Slovene teacher in Pančevo, convinced him that sound was a vibration of bodies, and was the first to tell him the story of Franklin and his kite.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“He soon convinced me that sound was a vibration of bodies.”
Pupin writes that Kos, his teacher and interpreter of physical phenomena, could not explain what the boys on the pasture knew: that sound travels through the ground far better than through the air, and better through hard ground than through ploughed soil.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“Kos, the Slovenian, my teacher and interpreter of physical phenomena, could not explain this”
Pupin himself claims that this pasture experience was the basis of a discovery he made some twenty-five years later. That is his interpretation, not independently established causation.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“It is the basis of a discovery which I made about twenty-five years after my novel experiences in that herdsmen’s summer school in Idvor.”
Cucić gives the name of Pupin's physics teacher at the Pančevo school as Šimon Kos. He adds that many call him only “Kos the Slovenian” because Pupin's autobiography never gives his first name.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Confirm the first name in the Pančevo school's annual report (Jahresbericht) staff list, about 1870-1872.
The years the story gives for Pančevo, Vienna and Prague are ours. Pupin names the spring of 1872 (Miletić's visit), then the first of May, and says he stayed with his class to the end of the school year. He does not give the year he left for Prague, so we place Pančevo up to 1872, Vienna in 1872 and Prague from 1872. The end of the Prague stay comes from the sailing from Hamburg on 12 March 1874. We do not know when his schooling in Pančevo began.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Confirm the year of the move to Prague and the start of the Pančevo schooling in school or church records (see Cucić).
Pančevo · May Day festival, probably 1872
Father Vasa stood up for him.
A fight over flags broke out at the school’s May Day celebration. Mihajlo was caught in the commotion with an Austrian flag under his feet. He faced expulsion.
The Pančevo priest, Father Vasa Živković, spoke up for him. It was the second time that year.
He then called Mihajlo’s parents to Pančevo. After their discussion, they decided that Mihajlo should continue his schooling in Prague. The priest and his congregation promised support.
“His name, Vasa Zhivkovich, I shall never forget, because it is sweet music to my ears”
Why do we say this?
When the Hungarian authorities said after a nationalist procession that the boy must go back to Idvor, Kos and Father Živković intervened and he stayed.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
We derive the date 1 May 1872 from the order of the text: Pupin describes Miletić's visit 'in the early spring of 1872', then 'the first of May, following'. Pupin does not give the full date himself.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Confirm against Pančevo school or church records if available (see Cucić).
At the priest's invitation his parents came to Pančevo. The meeting ended in a 'triumph' for his mother: the boy would go to Prague.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
On his way to Prague, Mihajlo fell asleep on the train and missed his connection. He woke in Vienna, at the last stop. An official in gold braid scolded him and threatened to send him back to the border.
An older couple overheard and intervened. They paid for his ticket from Vienna to Prague. In return, he offered them the bread his mother had baked for him.
They told him they were from America. Along the way they talked about Franklin and Lincoln and recommended Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Pupin did not record their names.
“You had two splendid teachers, your father and your mother”
Why do we say this?
On the way to Prague he fell asleep on the train and missed the change at Gänserndorf. He woke in Vienna, at the last stop. There an official scolded him and threatened to send him back, and there the couple stepped in.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
On the way to Prague, while an official threatened him, an elderly couple stepped into the conversation. His ticket from Vienna to Prague was paid. They were Americans.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“You had two splendid teachers, your father and your mother”
The years the story gives for Pančevo, Vienna and Prague are ours. Pupin names the spring of 1872 (Miletić's visit), then the first of May, and says he stayed with his class to the end of the school year. He does not give the year he left for Prague, so we place Pančevo up to 1872, Vienna in 1872 and Prague from 1872. The end of the Prague stay comes from the sailing from Hamburg on 12 March 1874. We do not know when his schooling in Pančevo began.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Confirm the year of the move to Prague and the start of the Pančevo schooling in school or church records (see Cucić).
Prague · 1872–1874
Letters waiting for courage.
In Prague he soon found friends among young Czech rebels. School began to bore him.
He carried two letters of introduction from Father Vasa, addressed to Rieger and Palacký, leaders of the Czech national movement. For months he could not bring himself to deliver them. He went only after the priest wrote to ask why he had not done so.
Rieger gave him a florin and some advice: more books, less politics. Palacký gave him a book about Hus and offered help if he needed it.
“if I would only spend more time on my books and less on my nationalist chums”
Why do we say this?
He carried two letters of introduction from Father Živković to Prague, for Rieger and for Palacký.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Rieger, a leader of the Czech nationalists, advised the boy, who had fallen in with a revolutionary set in Prague, to study more and spend less time on nationalist agitation.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“if I would only spend more time on my books and less on my nationalist chums”
The years the story gives for Pančevo, Vienna and Prague are ours. Pupin names the spring of 1872 (Miletić's visit), then the first of May, and says he stayed with his class to the end of the school year. He does not give the year he left for Prague, so we place Pančevo up to 1872, Vienna in 1872 and Prague from 1872. The end of the Prague stay comes from the sailing from Hamburg on 12 March 1874. We do not know when his schooling in Pančevo began.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Confirm the year of the move to Prague and the start of the Pančevo schooling in school or church records (see Cucić).
Prague, then Hamburg · 1873–1874
Stay — Olimpijada said.
While in Prague in 1873, he received a letter from his sister: his father, Kosta, had died suddenly.
Mihajlo wanted to return to Idvor and help his mother with the land. She insisted that he remain in Prague and continue his schooling.
School, however, was not going well. In his autobiography he admitted that he had studied only as much as he had to and had not asked Pančevo for the promised help.
He did not want to burden his mother. He decided to leave for America and sold his books, watch, clothes and yellow sheepskin coat. He was left with a red fez that nobody wanted to buy.
On 12 March 1874 he sailed from Hamburg aboard the Westphalia. He wrote to his mother that he was leaving for “the land of Franklin and Lincoln”.
“But she would not listen, and insisted that I stay in Prague”
Why do we say this?
In Prague a letter came from his sister: his father had died suddenly.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
On arriving in New York, he went through Castle Garden, the immigrant reception centre. He arrived with five cents. In his autobiography he recalled spending them on a prune pie full of pits.
He had no relatives in America. The examiners asked whom he knew there. He gave three names: Franklin, Lincoln and Harriet Beecher Stowe. These were not personal acquaintances, but people he had heard and read about.
He had heard about Franklin from his teacher Kos, and about Lincoln from Baba Batikin in Idvor. The couple on the train had recommended Harriet Beecher Stowe’s book.
One of the examiners was a Swiss man with one leg, a Civil War veteran. He smiled and told Mihajlo that he had chosen his American acquaintances well. Then he whispered something to the others. They let Mihajlo through.
Pupin did not record what the examiner whispered, or his name.
“My mention of the name of this great woman, together with the names of Lincoln and of Franklin, as Americans that I knew something about, had won me the sympathy of the immigration officials at Castle Garden, who, otherwise, might have deported me.”
Why do we say this?
He brought five cents to America and spent them at once on a prune pie that turned out to be full of pits.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Kos, a Slovene teacher in Pančevo, convinced him that sound was a vibration of bodies, and was the first to tell him the story of Franklin and his kite.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“He soon convinced me that sound was a vibration of bodies.”
That the one-legged veteran's whisper decided it is our inference. Pupin describes the whisper and the outcome, but not what was said.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Pupin later writes that those three names won him the sympathy of the officials at Castle Garden, who might otherwise have deported him.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“My mention of the name of this great woman, together with the names of Lincoln and of Franklin, as Americans that I knew something about, had won me the sympathy of the immigration officials at Castle Garden, who, otherwise, might have deported me.”
In America he first worked on a farm in Delaware. On the first evening a girl showed him paper and ink, and he wrote to his mother. In his mind he called her the Vila, like the fairies of Serbian folk poetry.
She taught him English words and corrected his mistakes. Once she called him “smart”.
Later he worked in a New York cracker factory. Jim, the fireman, let him into the boiler room and patiently explained the steam engine. In his autobiography Pupin called Jim his first professor of engineering.
When Mihajlo wanted a fireman’s licence, Jim refused to help him obtain it. He advised him to aim higher and encouraged him to join evening classes at Cooper Union.
In their first lesson the Vila taught him twenty words, and in the next another twenty. The Cooper Union library later became his refuge during difficult times.
“She called me “smart,” and I never forgot the word.”
Why do we say this?
On his first evening on the Delaware farm, a girl he privately called the Vila pointed him to paper and ink. That evening he wrote to his mother.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Jim, the fireman and boiler-room engineer at the cracker factory on Cortlandt Street, let him into the boiler room and patiently explained the steam engine.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Several people helped him prepare for the Columbia entrance exams. Bilharz, a former theology student working in the same factory, taught him Greek and Latin grammar. He told Mihajlo that his accent was dreadful, but could be improved.
The Lukanitch family helped him find his way in his new surroundings. Doctor Shepard gave him work and brought in Professor Webster to prepare him for the entrance exams.
Jim supported his decision to leave the factory, and Bilharz was pleased to have helped. In September 1879 Mihajlo passed the Columbia entrance exams. He knew the first two books of the Iliad and four of Cicero’s orations by heart.
For days Bilharz spoke to no one. He began to talk when he saw Mihajlo’s sincere admiration for his learning.
“The first two books of the Iliad, excepting the catalogue of ships, and four orations of Cicero, I knew by heart.”
Why do we say this?
Bilharz, a former theology student doing the humblest work in the same factory, guided him through Greek and Latin grammar, even before the boy decided to aim for Columbia.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
In the last week of September 1879 he sat the oral entrance exams at Columbia. He knew the first two books of the Iliad and four orations of Cicero by heart.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“The first two books of the Iliad, excepting the catalogue of ships, and four orations of Cicero, I knew by heart.”
We read the year 1879 from Pupin's mention of 'summer 1879' directly before the entrance exams 'of that year'.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
After graduating from Columbia in 1883 he studied at Cambridge (1883–1885), then physics in Berlin under Hermann von Helmholtz (1885–1889), taking his doctorate in 1889.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Prodanović's timeline says 'under Helmholtz' and gives no locator; the formal supervision of the doctorate is not established. The autobiography only supports the lectures and the suggestion and approval of the research (claim helmholtz-dissertation).
Columbia University, New York · autumn 1879
Look how many there were.
Do you remember everyone we have met along the way?
the herd boys
his mother, Olimpijada
Šimon Kos, his teacher
Fr. Vasa Živković
the couple on the train
Rieger
Palacký
the examiner at Castle Garden
Baba Batikin
the “Vila”
Jim, the fireman
Cooper Union
Bilharz
the Lukanitch family
Dr. Shepard
Prof. Webster
16 helpers in this part of the story.
III Knowledge in service of others
New York, Cambridge, Berlin · 1883–1892
The question became work.
He graduated from Columbia in 1883. He continued his studies at Cambridge in England, then in Berlin, where he attended Hermann von Helmholtz’s lectures. Helmholtz, Pupin writes, suggested a topic for his doctoral research and approved the finished work.
While he was studying in Berlin in 1886, a letter arrived telling him that his mother, Olimpijada, had died. He vowed to preserve her memory.
He earned his doctorate in 1889 and that year returned to Columbia in New York. From 1892 he was professor of mathematical physics at Columbia. Among the problems he later investigated was the fading of a voice along long telephone cables.
Why do we say this?
After graduating from Columbia in 1883 he studied at Cambridge (1883–1885), then physics in Berlin under Hermann von Helmholtz (1885–1889), taking his doctorate in 1889.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Prodanović's timeline says 'under Helmholtz' and gives no locator; the formal supervision of the doctorate is not established. The autobiography only supports the lectures and the suggestion and approval of the research (claim helmholtz-dissertation).
Pupin writes that in his first year of study in Berlin he attended Helmholtz’s lectures.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Pupin writes that Helmholtz suggested he might find material for a doctoral dissertation in a topic Pupin had found in physical chemistry, later approved his switch to a mathematical research, and approved the finished work by telegram.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Pupin's coils, placed at regular intervals in telephone cables, keep the signal strong over long distances; in practice they made long-distance calls possible.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
That day he vowed to keep his mother's memory alive. Twenty-seven years later the Serbian Academy of Sciences announced that the income of a foundation in memory of Olympiada Pupin would help poor schoolboys every year.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“the income of a foundation in memory of Olympiada Pupin would be expended annually to assist a goodly number of poor schoolboys”
In the late nineteenth century, a voice faded along an ordinary telephone cable after some twenty miles. Attempts to improve transmission by placing coils through guesswork had failed.
Pupin calculated how far apart the coils needed to be placed. In his autobiography he gave the spacing: every four or five miles on overhead lines, every mile or two in a cable. His coils made telephone conversations between distant cities possible.
When explaining the discovery in his autobiography, he returned to the game in the Idvor pasture. He used the image of a light silk cord with heavy bird-shot at equal intervals. Such a cord carries a vibration far.
“The herdsman’s assistants in Idvor, when I was a boy, profited much from it in their signalling through the ground.”
Why do we say this?
Ordinary telephone cables of the time, Pupin writes, work well over only some twenty miles.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Pupin writes that he succeeded because he did not guess but calculated: one coil every four or five miles of overhead line, every mile or two in a cable.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Pupin's coils, placed at regular intervals in telephone cables, keep the signal strong over long distances; in practice they made long-distance calls possible.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
He explains his solution with an image: a light silk cord with heavy bird-shot at equal intervals carries a vibration much better than a cord without them.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“a light silk cord stretched between two fixed points and carrying at equidistant points heavy bird-shot will act like a heavy uniform cord”
Pupin himself claims that this pasture experience was the basis of a discovery he made some twenty-five years later. That is his interpretation, not independently established causation.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“It is the basis of a discovery which I made about twenty-five years after my novel experiences in that herdsmen’s summer school in Idvor.”
Comparing the coils with the people in this story is ours. Pupin does not make that comparison.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
New York · 1907–1909
The door he entered through was open to others.
Some thirty years after his own arrival through Castle Garden, Pupin was president of the Slavonic Immigrant Society in New York. The society met new immigrants at Ellis Island and found them work.
In 1909 the society bought a house at 23rd Street and Ninth Avenue. Poor immigrants received a bed, food and help finding work there, free of charge. According to a Slovene newspaper published in New York at the time, Pupin raised the money and contributed 9,000 dollars himself.
Why do we say this?
In July 1907 the Slavonic Immigrant Society in New York sends out an appeal for support, signed by Pupin as president. The society promises a labour bureau, to protect newcomers from exploiting employers and agents.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
In October 1909 the society buys its own house at 23rd Street and Ninth Avenue, for 31,000 dollars. According to the paper, Pupin raised the money from wealthy Americans and gave 9,000 dollars himself. Poor immigrants get free lodging and food there, and help finding work; the society also works on Ellis Island.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
The link between the examiner at Castle Garden and the home for newcomers is ours. Pupin never states it, and the autobiography does not mention the home.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Berlin, 1886 · Serbian Royal Academy, 1914
Her name did not remain only a memory.
According to the press of June 1914, Pupin gave the Serbian Royal Academy 80,000 dollars for a fund in his mother’s name. Its income was to support poor and gifted pupils.
He had vowed to preserve her memory much earlier, when he learned of her death in Berlin in 1886. In his autobiography he mentions a foundation in her memory right after that vow.
Olimpijada could not read, but wanted her son to have an education. The fund in her name was meant to give other children that opportunity. In his letter to the Academy, Pupin explained why:
“S to ustanovo želim izraziti hvaležnost moji materi, katera me je pod bremenom težkih žrtev iz vaške šole poslala na višjo mestno šolo, dasi sama v svojem detinstvu nikdar ni videla niti vaške šole”
“With this foundation I wish to express my gratitude to my mother, who, under the burden of heavy sacrifices, sent me from the village school to a higher school in town, though in her own childhood she had never seen even a village school”
Why do we say this?
While he was studying in Berlin, a letter came from his sister: his mother had died.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
Open question:Prodanović gives 1886 (family tree). Confirm with a primary record (parish register).
That day he vowed to keep his mother's memory alive. Twenty-seven years later the Serbian Academy of Sciences announced that the income of a foundation in memory of Olympiada Pupin would help poor schoolboys every year.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“the income of a foundation in memory of Olympiada Pupin would be expended annually to assist a goodly number of poor schoolboys”
In June 1914 the press reports that Pupin gave the Serbian Royal Academy 80,000 dollars, about 400,000 dinars, as the capital of a fund in the name of his mother, “who suffered much and went hungry to educate her son”. The income goes to prizes and grants for poor and gifted pupils of the gymnasiums in Skopje, Bitola, Ohrid, Prizren, Peć and other towns of the “newly liberated lands”, and the rest to the Sokol societies there.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
The paper also quotes part of Pupin's letter to the Academy, in Slovene translation: with the foundation he thanks his mother, who sent him from the village school to a school in town though she herself had never even seen a village school. He is sure, he writes, that there are many such mothers in the newly liberated lands today. The letter survives only in that Slovene translation, so the English here is translated from it.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
“S to ustanovo želim izraziti hvaležnost moji materi, katera me je pod bremenom težkih žrtev iz vaške šole poslala na višjo mestno šolo, dasi sama v svojem detinstvu nikdar ni videla niti vaške šole”
“With this foundation I wish to express my gratitude to my mother, who, under the burden of heavy sacrifices, sent me from the village school to a higher school in town, though in her own childhood she had never seen even a village school” (translated from Slovene)
After graduating from Columbia in 1883 he studied at Cambridge (1883–1885), then physics in Berlin under Hermann von Helmholtz (1885–1889), taking his doctorate in 1889.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Prodanović's timeline says 'under Helmholtz' and gives no locator; the formal supervision of the doctorate is not established. The autobiography only supports the lectures and the suggestion and approval of the research (claim helmholtz-dissertation).
Pupin writes “twenty-seven years later”; with 1886 that gives about 1913. The press reports the gift in June 1914 as fresh news. The one-year gap may lie in Pupin's count or in the year of his mother's death.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Find the Serbian Academy (SANU) founding act of the fund, to fix the year.
Olimpijada could neither read nor write.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
After the First World War, in March 1919, the Yugoslav delegation invited Pupin to the Paris Peace Conference. He knew the American president, Wilson, personally. He stayed in Paris for seven weeks.
That same year Pančevo welcomed him as a guest. In the town where he had once attended school and heard about Franklin from Kos, he addressed the people gathered there.
In 1921 the Bled municipal council made him an honorary citizen. The newspapers of the time, and Pupin himself, linked that gratitude to his help for Bled at the peace conference.
The news reached him by telegram. In a letter to a friend, he described how much it delighted him:
“Čutil sem se kot mladenič, ki je ob koncu koncev in po dolgem čakanju dobil ljubavno pismo od dekleta, v katero se je zaljubil”
“I felt like a young man who at long last, after a long wait, received a love letter from the girl he had fallen in love with”
Why do we say this?
Pupin writes that in March 1919 the chairman of the Yugoslav delegation invited him to the peace conference in Paris, and that he spent seven weeks there. Bled is not mentioned in the book.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“In March of 1919, the chairman of the Yugoslav delegation at the Paris peace conference invited me to go to Paris”
After Paris, in 1919, Pančevo invites him to a gala session. Pupin describes it as the town where he first heard of Franklin and his kite from his teacher Kos.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
At its session on 20 September 1921 the Bled municipal council elected Pupin an honorary citizen because, as the report puts it, “as a true Slav he saved our corner of Upper Carniola, especially Bled and Bohinj”.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
“ki si je pridobil za Bled veliko zaslug in kot zaveden Slovan rešil naš gorenjski kot, zlasti Bled in Bohinj”
“who earned great merit for Bled and, as a true Slav, saved our corner of Upper Carniola, especially Bled and Bohinj” (translated from Slovene)
In the essay “Golden Slovenia” (1922) Pupin himself gives the reason: the head of Bled told him he was chosen out of gratitude, because two years earlier, at the peace conference in Paris, he had helped to save Bled. That is his word and the municipality's; we have not yet read a document from the conference itself.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“me je izvolil za častnega občana in me obvestil, da je to storil iz hvaležnosti, ker sem pred dvema letoma na mirovni konferenci v Parizu pomagal, da se je Bled ohranil”
“elected me an honorary citizen and told me that this was done out of gratitude, because two years before, at the peace conference in Paris, I had helped to preserve Bled” (translated from Slovene)
The same paper explains why: at the peace conference the Italians had claimed the Bled basin too, and Pupin, the paper says, persuaded Wilson to resist it. It presents this as common knowledge (“Znano je”, “It is known”), without a source.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
Open question:Pupin's own essay (1922) gives the same reason in his words. No document from the Paris peace conference showing his part in the Bled question has been read. Look in the Yugoslav delegation's records and the US delegation papers.
Prodanović (2026) writes that, thanks to Pupin's efforts at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, Bled remained within the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
The link between the teacher Kos and Bled is ours. Pupin writes that Kos came from Carniola; Bled is in Upper Carniola. We do not know which place Kos came from, and no source connects Kos with Bled.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
In a letter to a friend, quoted by the paper, Pupin writes that the telegram with the news delighted him.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
“me vsaj nekdo v Sloveniji ima rad, kakor jaz ljubim vso Slovenijo”
“at least someone in Slovenia loves me, as I love all of Slovenia” (translated from Slovene)
In the same letter he writes that he felt like a young man who, after a long wait, had received a love letter.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
“Čutil sem se kot mladenič, ki je ob koncu koncev in po dolgem čakanju dobil ljubavno pismo od dekleta, v katero se je zaljubil”
“I felt like a young man who at long last, after a long wait, received a love letter from the girl he had fallen in love with” (translated from Slovene)
Cucić gives the name of Pupin's physics teacher at the Pančevo school as Šimon Kos. He adds that many call him only “Kos the Slovenian” because Pupin's autobiography never gives his first name.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Confirm the first name in the Pančevo school's annual report (Jahresbericht) staff list, about 1870-1872.
Columbia, New York · 1892–1923
What he received, he began to pass on.
Alongside his research and public work, Pupin taught students at Columbia. Among them was Edwin Armstrong, whose inventions contributed to the development of broadcasting.
In 1923 he proposed the idea of a radio university: lectures could be heard by workers over lunch, families at home and even prisoners. Education could reach people who had previously been denied it.
He had also helped establish the National Research Council. He devoted the last chapter of his autobiography, published in 1923, to that earlier work.
Columbia also remembers John Morecroft among the first graduate students he inspired.
In his autobiography Pupin wondered whether something of what the Serbian bagpipes had stirred in him had passed to his students.
“Perhaps some of those thrills which the Serbian bagpiper stirred up in me in my early youth were transferred to my pupils, Armstrong and Vreeland.”
Why do we say this?
Pupin names his pupils Armstrong and Vreeland and wonders whether some of the thrill the Serbian bagpipes stirred in him passed on to them.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
“Perhaps some of those thrills which the Serbian bagpiper stirred up in me in my early youth were transferred to my pupils, Armstrong and Vreeland.”
In 1923 Pupin imagined a “radio university”: lectures heard in public halls, by factory workers over lunch, by families at home, even by prisoners. Education for those who had been denied it.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Mihajlo Pupin died in New York in March 1935 after a long illness. The New York paper Glas naroda reported on 13 March that he had died the day before. His daughter was with him and closed his eyes.
If he died on 12 March, it was the anniversary of his departure for America: on 12 March 1874 he had sailed from Hamburg aboard the Westphalia, sixty-one years earlier. The exact date of death has not yet been confirmed by another source, so the coincidence remains an open question.
Why do we say this?
The New York paper Glas naroda reports on 13 March 1935 that Pupin died the day before, in New York, after a long illness. His daughter was with him and closed his eyes.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
Open question:Slovenski narod (Ljubljana, 13 Mar 1935) writes “davi” (this morning) under a New York dateline of 13 March; the New York paper's “yesterday” gives 12 March. Confirm with the death certificate or a New York obituary.
The ship Westphalia sailed from Hamburg for America on 12 March 1874.
Pupin's own accountPupin wrote this decades later, in his autobiography. It is his memory and his interpretation, not independent confirmation.
If he died on 12 March 1935, as the New York paper reports, that is the same day he had sailed for America sixty-one years before. The comparison of the two dates is ours: 12 March 1874 (the autobiography) and 12 March 1935 (the press). Pupin could not have written it down. The date of death has an open question, so the coincidence is not treated as established.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Open question:Depends on the death date: see death-1935. If the death was on 13 March, drop the coincidence.
After graduating from Columbia in 1883 he studied at Cambridge (1883–1885), then physics in Berlin under Hermann von Helmholtz (1885–1889), taking his doctorate in 1889.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
Open question:Prodanović's timeline says 'under Helmholtz' and gives no locator; the formal supervision of the doctorate is not established. The autobiography only supports the lectures and the suggestion and approval of the research (claim helmholtz-dissertation).
Pupin's coils, placed at regular intervals in telephone cables, keep the signal strong over long distances; in practice they made long-distance calls possible.
Scholarly or institutional sourceWork by a researcher or institution, based on other sources.
In October 1909 the society buys its own house at 23rd Street and Ninth Avenue, for 31,000 dollars. According to the paper, Pupin raised the money from wealthy Americans and gave 9,000 dollars himself. Poor immigrants get free lodging and food there, and help finding work; the society also works on Ellis Island.
Contemporary primary sourceA document made at the time of the event.
Open question:Confirm in the New York English-language press of October 1909 (the purchase and Pupin's gift).
That Pupin's answer to that question lies in the people he describes is our reading of the book. He does not state it in one sentence.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
IV What stays with us
Who believed in you before you believed in yourself?
What did he bring to America? Five cents. And all of them.
Why do we say this?
The answer “five cents, and all of them” is our summary of the story, not Pupin's sentence.
Our inferenceWe infer this from the sources. The source does not say it outright.
Now the signal goes on — through you.
Perhaps you remember someone who lent you a book, explained a problem or took the time to listen.
And who has been helped by your time, knowledge or patience?
Put out one star.
Here are the people and events from this story. Choose one act of help. What followed will go dark: we do not know how Pupin’s life would have unfolded without it.
Imagine Vasa did not stand up that day.
We are not erasing a man. We are silencing one act of help, on one day.
This happened
When the Hungarian authorities said after a nationalist procession that the boy must go back to Idvor, Kos and Father Živković intervened and he stayed. Pupin's own account
At the May Day festival the boy was caught in a scuffle with the Austrian flag under his feet. Expulsion loomed. Father Živković defended him again. Pupin's own account
At the priest's invitation his parents came to Pančevo. The meeting ended in a 'triumph' for his mother: the boy would go to Prague. Pupin's own account
The priest and his congregation promised help if schooling in Prague proved too heavy for his parents. Pupin's own account
He carried two letters of introduction from Father Živković to Prague, for Rieger and for Palacký. Pupin's own account
This is likely
Without his defense, expulsion from school would have been more likely. Our inference
Without his invitation to the parents and without the letters, the road to Prague would have been harder, or different. Our inference
No one knows this
Whether Mihajlo would still have reached America.
Whether he would have got there another way.
Whether he would have got there later.
Whether he would have made the same discoveries.
History does not know what would have happened without him. It knows that someone stood up that day.
One priest stood up for one boy, one day. Everything that just went dark came after that day: Prague, America, Columbia University, the coils that carry the human voice across continents, his students, radio. We do not know what would have happened without him. We know how much came after one man stood up.
Imagine the couple on the train had not stepped in.
We are not erasing anyone. We are silencing one act of help, on one journey.
This happened
On the way to Prague, while an official threatened him, an elderly couple stepped into the conversation. His ticket from Vienna to Prague was paid. They were Americans. Pupin's own account
On the train they told him stories of Benjamin Franklin, of Lincoln and of America, and urged him to read Harriet Beecher Stowe's “Uncle Tom's Cabin”. Pupin's own account
Before the examiners he admitted that he knew nobody in America except Franklin, Lincoln and Harriet Beecher Stowe. Pupin's own account
Pupin later writes that those three names won him the sympathy of the officials at Castle Garden, who might otherwise have deported him. Pupin's own account
This is likely
Without the paid fare the road to Prague would have been harder; the clerk was already threatening him. Our inference
Without their advice he might not have read “Uncle Tom's Cabin” before America. Our inference
No one knows this
Whether at Castle Garden he would have named Harriet Beecher Stowe.
Whether the officials would still have let him in.
History does not know what would have happened without them. It knows that two strangers on a train paid the fare of a boy in a sheepskin coat.
Two strangers paid for one ticket and recommended one book. That book was later one of the three names at Castle Garden. Everything that just went dark came after that train. We do not know what would have happened without them. We do not even know their names.
Imagine his mother had not said: stay.
We are not erasing his mother. We are silencing one sentence, on one day.
This happened
In Prague a letter came from his sister: his father had died suddenly. Pupin's own account
He wanted to return to Idvor and help his mother with the land. She would not hear of it and insisted he stay in Prague. Pupin's own account
To raise the fare he sold his books, his watch and his clothes, including the yellow sheepskin coat. He kept a red fez nobody would buy. Pupin's own account
The ship Westphalia sailed from Hamburg for America on 12 March 1874. Pupin's own account
This is likely
Had he gone home, he would probably have worked the land in Idvor, at least for a while. Our inference
The road from Prague to America, as it was, would not have begun then. Our inference
No one knows this
Whether he would ever have set out into the world again.
Whether he would have reached America later, and how.
Whether he would have found the same road to science.
History does not know what would have happened had he gone back. It knows that his mother, who could not read, told him: stay.
A woman who could not read said one word to her son: stay. Everything that just went dark came after that word. We do not know what would have happened had she said: come home.
Imagine the examiner had whispered nothing.
We do not even know his name. We are silencing only his whisper.
This happened
One of the examiners at Castle Garden had only one leg. He was Swiss, a veteran of the American Civil War. We do not know his name. Pupin's own account
The one-legged examiner told him in German that he had shown good taste in his American acquaintances. Pupin's own account
While he was being questioned, the veteran nodded. Then he whispered something to the others, and they let him through. Pupin's own account
Later the veteran looked him up and told him the examiners had made an exception for him. Pupin's own account
Pupin later writes that those three names won him the sympathy of the officials at Castle Garden, who might otherwise have deported him. Pupin's own account
This is likely
Without his sympathy the exception would probably not have been made. Our inference
That his whisper in particular decided it is our inference. Our inference
No one knows this
What he whispered.
What his name was.
What would have become of a boy sent back to Europe without money.
History does not know what he said. It knows that one man without a name looked at the boy and nodded.
A one-legged man whispered something to the others. Everything that just went dark passed through that door afterwards. What he whispered, we don't know. What his name was, we don't know. We know how much followed that boy through.
Imagine Jim had said yes.
We are not erasing the fireman. We only imagine he had not said: aim higher.
This happened
Jim, the fireman and boiler-room engineer at the cracker factory on Cortlandt Street, let him into the boiler room and patiently explained the steam engine. Pupin's own account
When the boy wanted to become a licensed fireman, Jim refused to help and told him to aim higher. Pupin's own account
Pupin writes that in never missing a chance to encourage him, Jim reminded him much of his mother. Pupin's own account
Jim talked him into joining Cooper Union evening classes. Afterwards the boy explained the lectures back to him. Pupin's own account
This is likely
With a fireman's licence he would probably have stayed in the boiler room for a while. Our inference
The evening classes at Cooper Union would have begun later, or never. Our inference
No one knows this
Whether he would have reached Columbia without that advice.
Who else would have told him the same.
History does not know what would have happened had he become a fireman. It knows that a fireman told him: aim higher.
A fireman refused to help a boy become a fireman. Everything that just went dark came after that no. Sometimes a refusal is help too.
The whole sky.
This is his whole life: everyone the story met, and some it had no room for. Touch a star.
taught him to hear a signal through the groundthe herd boys · name not kept
wanted him to have another pair of eyeshis mother, Olimpijada
showed him that sound is a vibrationŠimon Kos, his teacher
stood up for himFr. Vasa Živković
paid his ticket to Praguethe couple on the train · name not kept
advised him to studyRieger
promised him helpPalacký
whispered something to the othersthe examiner at Castle Garden · name not kept
taught him his first English wordsthe “Vila” · name not kept
told him to aim higherJim, the fireman
was his refugeCooper Union
guided him through Greek and LatinBilharz
helped him build a bridgethe Lukanitch family
gave him a job and a tutorDr. Shepard
prepared him for the entrance examProf. Webster
the name Lincoln, heard from himBaba Batikin
Places
Idvor · Pančevo · Vienna · Prague · Castle Garden · Delaware · New York · Columbia University, New York · Berlin · Laboratory, Columbia · Paris · New York, 1935
The help passed to
help for poor schoolboys, in his mother's namethe Olympiada Pupin fund
his pupil and research associateArmstrong
his pupilVreeland
early inspirationMorecroft
helped bring it into beingNational Research Council
onward, through his students' studentsthe next generations · name not kept
imagined school for those denied itthe radio university
thanked for having “saved Bled and Bohinj”Bled, Slovenia
a roof, food and work for newcomersSlavonic Immigrant Society
Pupin recorded some of their names. Others remain unknown.
Excerpts from the autobiography are quoted from the English original (public domain). Excerpts from Slovene newspapers of 1907, 1909, 1914, 1921, 1922 and 1935 are quoted from the digitised text on dLib.si, and the excerpt from an English newspaper of 1930 from archive.org. Translations are our own.